Look at the University of Cambridge in Oxford is exactly where the difference of university education and the British Sohu China have different education system through the data, in the educational system, training mode and teaching emphases are different. All along, Oxford, Cambridge are the world’s top universities, ranking the top of the list, and Tsinghua University in recent years, the momentum is very fierce, but there are still not a small gap with cattle sword. So, as China’s top universities in the north and the world’s top universities gap? We are following through the University of Cambridge, Peking University, University of Oxford, Tsinghua University in the "times higher education world university rankings" and "QS" world university rankings in the indicators of specific differences, through the data at China University and the world’s top universities to the gap at the end where? University of Cambridge VS Peking University times: University of Cambridge NO.4 Peking University NO.42 score 92.8 score 72? "The basic situation of the times higher education world university rankings" (hereinafter referred to as the Thames version) with 13 index. In the 2015 edition of Thames, University of Cambridge, a total of 92.8, ranking fourth; Peking University, a total of 72, ranked forty-second. As can be seen in the picture: the number of students in Peking University is two times larger than that of Oxford, and the proportion of teachers and students of Peking University is as high as that of the 8.3. University of Cambridge and a higher degree of internationalization, the proportion of foreign students was 34%, much higher than the Peking University. The differences between the two schools in? 13 index chart. The solid circle on behalf of Peking University, University of Cambridge as a hollow circle. Peking University leading University of Cambridge project has 5, namely: Dr. with bachelor’s degree (ratio of the first column, the weight is 2.25%), institutional funds (fourth bar, 2.25% weight), the ratio of students (fifth bar, 4.5% weight), research funding (seventh bar, 6% weight), and transfer of knowledge (Tenth bar. The weight of 2.5%). The north project is backward: Doctoral number and proportion of teachers (second bar, 6% weight (third), teaching reputation bar, weight 15%), published papers (sixth column, weight 6%), study the reputation (eighth bar, weight 18%), the citation rate of papers (Ninth bar, weight 30%), China the proportion of employees (eleventh bar, weight 2.5%), international cooperation (twelfth bar, 2.5% weight), and the proportion of international students (thirteenth bar, 2.5% weight). It can be seen that the institutions and research funding of Peking University are higher than in Cambridge, especially in terms of knowledge transfer far beyond Cambridge. However, the most important indicators of weight, such as teaching reputation (15%), research reputation (18%), and the paper citation rate (30%), the gap is very large and University of Cambridge. Two in the performance differences between the 7 index chart. The blue bar on behalf of Peking University, on behalf of Cambridge orange. "QS World University Rankings" (hereinafter referred to as the QS version) with 7 indicators. In the 2015 edition of QS, the total score of 99.4 in University of Cambridge!相关的主题文章:

Similar Posts